Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Movie Review : Session 9 (2001)


Country: 

USA

Starring:

Peter Mullan
David Caruso
Stephen Gevedon
Josh Lucas
Paul Guilfoyle
Brendan Sexton III

Directed By:

Brad Anderson



Happy Halloween! It's that day of the year again, where death and monsters are rated E for Everyone,  so I thought I'd made an effort and review the scariest, most crippling film I know. Fortunately for me, it also happens to be one of my favorite movies. SESSION 9, by Brad Anderson hasn't been a success in theaters. In fact, it didn't even come close to make its money. It's not before the DVD * release that it found its audience. Some movies just can't compete in theaters without adequate distribution and sitting next to blockbusters, but once they're cheap and accessible, they will reach out to the proper audience if they are good enough and "good" is a euphemism to describe SESSION 9. It's one of the most polarizing cult movies of this century. People are separated in two camps, regarding that movie. The first camp thinks this is the most boring movie ever, where nothing happens and camp two sleeps with the light opened for two weeks after a viewing. I am part of the latter and will do my best to explain you why.

Gordon Fleming (Mullan) has an asbestos removal company, competing for a job at an abandoned mental hospital. Pressured financially by competition and the recent addition to his family, he promises the city to do the job in a record time. If they do the job in one week, they will get a ten thousand dollar bonus, which puts the crew in front of a mountain of work. As they start to work, the place starting calling the workers in different ways. Free spirited Hank (Lucas) finds a fortune in old coins, hidden in the walls by what seemed to be a patient. Law school dropout Mike (Gevedon) finds tapes of psychotherapy sessions of Mary Hobbes, a patient with dissociative personality disorder and Gordon. He's drawn into the place like no other. Apparently, the same demon that got into Mary. What is exactly drawing him to the hospital has been subject of debate among horror movie fans for over a decade. It looks simple, but Brad Anderson and Stephen Gevedon (who co-wrote the script) have scattered plenty of clues throughout the movie that are seeds for future debate.

First of all, the obvious question. Why is SESSION 9 so scary? I have my own theory about that. It's a psychological horror movie that plays on the edge of supernatural. There are many plausible explanations for the evil that overcomes Gordon inside Danvers mental hospital, both rational or irrational. If the best, most lasting horror movies feed on the fear of the unknown, SESSION 9 milks it with surprising efficiency. Not only you can never identify the nature of Danvers' lingering evil (who answers to the charming name of "Simon"), but you're also never really sure how deeply symbolic the movie is about it. Because there is evident symbolism in the movie, but Brad Anderson point in both direction that Gordon's condition is both symbolic (he's ill) or not (he's haunted by a demon/ghost). The movie ends with the terrifying Simon, speaking to Mary's doctor and yet, you never know what he really is. Whatever he is, he got away with it again and nobody is safe from him. It leaves us with the terrifying conclusion that people suffering from mental health issues, really are haunted by invisible creatures.

Another way SESSION 9 is amazingly involving is by the subtle clues Brad Anderson buried into the editing of his movies. There is a lot going on under the frame and multiple viewings will reveal its hidden dynamics. For example, the first impression you get of David Caruso's character Phil is that he's an asshole. He's the jealous partner, who can't keep his emotions towards Hank in check. But Brad Anderson employs the limited Caruso with great restraint and keeps him laconic. The movie is structured around the days of the week where Gordon's workers are supposed to remove the asbestos, and right at the start of Friday, there is a short scene where Phil predicts what's going to happen during the day. There is also a short frame that ties Phil and Hank together right in the middle of the movie. I'm not going to spoil it, part of the pleasure of watching SESSION 9 is to find those. There is also two clear allusions to ghosts, hidden in the editing. Can you find them?

SESSION 9 is both a terrifying and bold psychological horror movie that proposes an unsettling hypothesis about the origin of psychological disorders, a scary/realistic depiction of dissociative personality disorder and a series of challenging riddles to resolve. I had the most heated debated with other viewers about what kind of man really was Phil. That's the kind of detail-oriented approach that gives movie lasting power. If your fans can argue on such small plot twists, it means you have created intriguing and involving art. SESSION  9 made me a Brad Anderson fan. He has made more amazing movies since, such as THE MACHINIST and TRANSSIBERIAN as well as he directed episodes from iconic shows such as THE WIRE and BOARDWALK EMPIRE, but so far, none of it has lived up to the frightening coherence and the intellectual audacity of SESSION 9. Moviegoes who like a good challenge that doesn't wall itself in its idiosyncrasies, psychology buffs and ghost movie enthusiasts don't want to miss this. It went through a decade as a cult hit, but we'll still talk about it fifty years from now, as a cinema classic.

FIVE STARS

* Well, VHS too. I own a beat-up VHS copy of this bad boy.


6 comments:

  1. I'm amazed someone apart from me has even seen this movie, never mind own a copy on VHS!

    Not sure I'd give it the full five, but I remember thinking it was cheap effective filmmaking and a sign of what was to come. Although it didn't turn out that way, went all found footage and shaky cam instead.

    mood

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting comment, mood. Usually whenever somebody follows the smart path, Hollywood makes it a point to do the exact opposites (really, they have marketing majors talking to screenwriters, telling them to write dumber, because according to the classes they had, masses are dumb). Also, I saw some inspiration from THE SHINING in there and I've been told that it draws from a movie called DON'T LOOK NOW.

    I gave it a full five, because it's one of the few movies I watched more than ten times. It was my 22nd or 23rd viewing I did for this review. Other films I did that for: Fight Club, Mallrats, The Big Lebowski and Snatch. I can literally reenact Mallrats along with the movie when it plays.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Big Lebowski and Fight Club are two of my favourite movies.

    Don't Look Now is one of the best made/most ridiculous movies ever (which is a good thing). The surprise ending is very surprising. Can't say I see many similarities though. Maybe in tone.

    mood

    ReplyDelete
  4. Man, I must've seen The Big Lebowski over a hundred times. So much, I picked up some expressions from it. Last week I surprised myself saying to someone: "It's a really complicated case, man. Lots of ins, lots of outs, lots of what have yous."

    That's powerful writing right there, man. Changing the way you speak.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I remember wanting to see Session 9 in theaters, but it didn’t stay long enough and I missed it entirely. I had actually forgotten all about this movie until one of the girls I work with at DISH told me that she watched it Halloween night, and it scared the living lights out of her kids. I’m glad that I decided to add this to my Blockbuster @Home queue that I get through DISH because I was able to watch the movie a few times since I wan’t in a hurry and in fear of late fees. This is definitely a movie that I had to watch a couple of times to fully appreciate, so in a way I’m glad I didn’t see it in theaters.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very good blog post. I certainly love this website. Keep
    it up!
    My web-site :: http://www.aluminumroofingsystem.com

    ReplyDelete